Your session will end in  seconds due to inactivity. Click here to continue using this web page.
Friday, February 05, 2010 | Comments (10)

John MacArthur

The world of 1993 was another time in many significant ways. That was a unique year, strikingly different from the rest of the 20th century—but also nothing at all like the Internet era, which was just about to begin.

History will no doubt always remember the early 1990s as a pivotal time in human history. In 1992, conservative op-ed commentator George Will published a compilation of his newspaper columns written over the prior three years. He titled the anthology Suddenly, which perfectly captured the spirit of the day. Suddenly, confusingly, everything was in flux. Worldly fads and philosophies were changing faster than ever. The changes were global and profound, affecting everything from art to zoology. Ideological changes, societal changes, political changes, and moral changes were the order of the day. The shifting of so many opinions and boundaries all at once was both drastic and disorienting.

No wonder. Every important worldview built on “modern” thought was now utterly discredited. Some of the most basic presuppositions modern secular society had staked out as true and certain were left totally in tatters.

A major turning point had occurred on November 9, 1989, when the Berlin wall fell literally overnight, signaling the failure of European Communism. The end of Lenin’s legacy came very quickly—and so did other monumental changes, all with stunning speed. Gorbachev, Glasnost, and the Gulf War dominated the news at the start of the 90s, but the Gulf War ended in early 1991 and the Soviet Union collapsed in August of that same year. Boris Yeltsin boldly defied an attempted coup, took the reins of Russian power, and began the formal dissolution of the Soviet empire.

By 1993, the world was emphatically renouncing the values of the Cold War. We were watching our parents’ concept of “modernity” quickly fade in the rear-view mirror. The word postmodernism was just starting to be used here and there in popular discourse—but the set of ideas it stands for were already evident everywhere. Before most people even realized we had witnessed the end of the modern era, postmodern values had completely altered the way the world thinks and talks about truth.

There was, of course, a positive side to the end of modernity. For one thing, many modern presuppositions needed to be debunked—starting with the notion that science and human reason are reliable arbiters of truth and falsehood. Modernity, nicknamed “The Age of Reason” by its earliest advocates, more or less began with a rejection of Scripture’s authority and the elevation of the human mind in its place. The fall of every major modern ideology exposed the hubris of that way of thinking, and that was unequivocally a good development.

Besides that, the worldwide remapping of political alliances opened wonderful new opportunities for ministry. I was privileged to make numerous trips to the former Soviet Union, teaching groups of pastors and preaching in Russian and Ukrainian churches. I went at the behest of Soviet Baptists and formed relationships with them that endure strongly to this day. During my earliest visits to that part of the world, I was absolutely amazed to see the strength and vitality of evangelical churches there. Their worship services were the very picture of austere simplicity—just the preaching of the Word and the celebration of the ordinances, totally devoid of the flash and entertainment being touted as essential tools for the times by all the “experts” back home. That got me thinking more deeply than ever about how the Lord builds His church and what it means to be a wise master builder (1 Cor. 3:10-15).

By the early ‘90s American evangelicalism was shamelessly imitating virtually every worldly fad. Church leaders and church-growth strategists openly described the gospel as a commodity to be sold at market, and the predictable result was a frantic attempt to make the gospel into the kind of product most buyers wanted. The conventional wisdom was that sophisticated marketing strategies were far more effective than gospel proclamation for reaching the “unchurched” multitudes. No one, it seemed, wanted to challenge that notion, which was buttressed with countless opinion polls. And who could argue with the obvious “success” of several entertainment-oriented megachurches?

Western evangelicals had been gradually losing interest in biblical preaching and doctrinal instruction for decades. The church in America had become weak, worldly, and man-centered. Evangelical ears were itching for something more hip and entertaining than biblical preaching (cf. 2 Tim. 4:3), and business-savvy evangelical pundits declared that it was foolish not to give people what they demanded. Without pragmatic methodologies numerical growth would be virtually impossible, they insisted—even though such pragmatism was manifestly detrimental to spiritual growth.

Churches were starving spiritually while overdosing on entertainment. A few prosperous megachurches masked the tragedy with incredibly large attendance figures, but anyone who took time to examine the trajectory could see that Western evangelicalism was in serious trouble.

By contrast, the beleaguered Iron-Curtain churches were hungry for biblical teaching, steadily gaining spiritual strength, and growing numerically on the strength of bold gospel ministry. After years of communist oppression, they were finally free to preach Christ openly, and that is precisely what they did. They were flourishing as a result.

Most Russian pastors had no formal training, so they sought help from the West in the areas of hermeneutics and doctrine. (That’s how I got involved with them.) The most mature and discerning leaders in the Iron-Curtain churches were wary of influences from the West. Frankly, I shared their concern and appreciated their caution. I was convinced that even the weakest of their churches could teach evangelicals in America a lot about the biblical approach to church growth. They understood that no legitimate church-growth strategy should ever fail to recognize the truth of John 15:19-20: “If you were of the world, the world would love its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, because of this the world hates you. Remember the word that I said to you, ‘A slave is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you; if they kept My word, they will keep yours also.”

When the Iron Curtain fell, however, “missionaries” from the West flooded the former Soviet Union, not so much with gospel-oriented resources and Bible-study tools, but with highly questionable evangelistic strategies—and with the same poisonous philosophy of church growth that had made Western evangelicalism so superficial and worldly. Russian church leaders were appalled that so many tawdry trends came into their culture from the West under the pretense of evangelism. I was offended, too—and embarrassed.

I remember watching glitzy American televangelists with comically big hair peddling their health-and-wealth message and other false gospels on Russian television during my earliest trips to Moscow. They probably had little effect on healthy Russian churches, but they injected a seriously false gospel into the public perception, totally confusing millions. Soviet people had been indoctrinated with atheism and shielded from the truth of Scripture. They therefore had no means of distinguishing truth from falsehood in religion. So much false Christianity on television no doubt inoculated multitudes against the real gospel.

I also remember seeing a parade of “student missionaries” from America putting on a variety show in a public square in Kiev, using every circus trick from jugglers to clowns, and every wordless type of entertainment from mimes to interpretive dance, all claiming to communicate “the gospel”—or something spiritual-sounding—across the language barrier. I frankly could not be certain what the actual message was supposed to be. I have a fairly good grasp of the gospel as Scripture presents it, and that was not the message being pantomimed in Independence Square. Again, I was embarrassed for the church in the West.

Back in America, these performances were being reported as serious evangelistic work. Judging from the numbers of supposed converts claimed, we might have expected churches in the Iron-Curtain countries to be doubling and quadrupling on a monthly basis.

Russian and Ukrainian Churches were indeed growing, but the evangelistic buskers and street artists from the West had nothing to do with that. Those churches grew because Russian Christians, now free to proclaim the gospel openly, preached repentance from sin and faith in Christ to their neighbors. The response was remarkable. I sat in many Russian worship services for hours at a time, hearing convert after convert publicly repent—renouncing former sins and declaring faith in Christ to the gathered church, always in standing-room-only crowds. It was the polar opposite of what American church-growth gurus insisted was absolutely necessary. But it was just like watching the book of Acts unfold in real life.

As a matter of fact, most of the Westerners who rushed to the former Soviet Union when communism collapsed missed the real signs of church growth in those years because they completely ignored the churches that were already there. They started parachurch organizations, opted for pure media ministry, sponsored Punch-and-Judy shows in the public square, or tried to start new churches modeled on Western worldly styles. Most of the visible results of that sort of “evangelistic” and church-planting activity proved to be blessedly short-lived.

What did last was by no means all good. Americans injected into that culture a style of worldly evangelicalism that is now gaining traction and causing confusion within the Russian-speaking churches. Those churches that had weathered decades of government harassment and public ridicule now have to contend with something much subtler but a thousand times worse: trendy methods from American evangelicals—gimmicks and novelties that diminish practically everything truly important in favor of things that appeal to people’s baser instincts.

By far the most subtle and dangerous Western influences came in through church-growth experts, missiologists, and professional pollsters. Unlike the televangelists and street performers, these academicians managed to gain a platform within Russian-speaking churches. They were trusted because they were writers, career missionaries, seminary professors with credentials, and even pastors. They brought loads of books and ideas, virtually all of them advocating a highly pragmatic approach to ministry that was foreign in every sense to a church that had lived under communist persecution for the better part of a century.

One struggles to imagine anything more grossly inappropriate than the fad-chasing pragmatism that was deliberately injected into Russian and eastern European churches by Westerners tinkering with theories about contextualization. But the influx of shallow evangelicalism into Russia in the early ‘90s was barely the tip of the iceberg. Thanks to various means of instant, inexpensive mass communications, the stultifying influence of dysfunctional American religion soon inundated the entire world. The Internet in particular suddenly opened the floodgates so that it became impossible to contain and control such nonsense. Within just a few years, evangelical gimmickry became the most visible and influential expression of Western “spirituality” worldwide.

The poison of religious pragmatism is now an enormous global problem.


Make a Comment

Click here to subscribe to comments without commenting.

You have 3000 characters remaining for your comment. Note: All comments must be approved before being posted.

Submit

#1  Posted by Bret Lee  |  Friday, February 05, 2010at 6:27 AM

Thank you thank you, John MacArthur, for taking your stand on the rock solid truth of God's word. I can't get enough of your messages. I have 41 messages on my ipod from you and have listened to everyone of them. Some I have listened to several times. I have taught many truths you have shared with me from these messages and will continue. I am so thankful God has kept you steadfast with the truth. It is very clear to me you take his word very seriously and handle it with the utmost care. I loved the tongues series and have shared that truth with many, most of those I have shared that with, hate that truth, and me for sharing it with them. It doesn't matter though, all that matters is we continue to speak it. In many ways it brings us closer to the trials and tribulations our Lord experienced. So, it is with great pleasure I continue on in the battle, and the race, to finish the work that has been laid out for me. I pray for your continued perseverance of truth no matter the cost, and I am quite sure you will deliver it. Thank you in the Lord!
#2  Posted by Ed Rudd  |  Friday, February 05, 2010at 7:04 AM

I can remember hearing television ministers taking credit for the fall of the Berlin wall. And then , as they still are now, clammering for your money because God needs it to spread the gospel into these new ripe fields. I recall one ministry claiming results where they saw 3 million people saved in just one meeting. However knowing their methods of evangelism, I have a degree of sceptism as to their genuine salvation which I believe to be Biblicaly justified.

This kind of weak presentation of the gospel- it's demands and seriousness is really dangerious in light of scriptures such as - Matt 18:6-7.

#3  Posted by Nena Jones  |  Friday, February 05, 2010at 10:25 AM

" (Those trends were exactly what prompted me to write this book in the first place.)"

Does anyone know what book this refers to? I assume it is Ashamed of the Gospel, but I can't be sure.

Dr. MacArthur's remarks are right on the mark. I thank God everyday for this man and his willingness to stand up for Truth and to share his incredible knowledge with us. Above all, we must take a stand for Truth!

#4  Posted by Bryan Chasteen  |  Friday, February 05, 2010at 7:15 PM

Upon reading this post, I couldn't help but thinking that the way that John MacArthur is describing America's influence on the world sounds strangely similar to the influence that Mystery Babylon the Great has on the world. Will America meet the same fate that that great city met when it was destroyed in one hour?

#5  Posted by Chuck Thompson  |  Saturday, February 06, 2010at 5:59 AM

Thanks for speaking the Truth! We're missing the main factor in the American church: The Holy Spirit. Does anybody remember him? Hopefully, we'll dump the shows, the marketing plans, and the consultants and re-open our Bibles to once again discover how church is conducted.

#6  Posted by Sena Gbesemete  |  Sunday, February 07, 2010at 3:24 AM

God richly bless you Pastor John. I recently found myself excommunicated from a church on the basis that i preach "heresies". Honestly it was a hard time but i have had to keep reminding myself of Christs encouragement in Mt 5 that we are blessed when people persecute us because of Christ and great is our reward.

Now i am looking and praying for a Pure bible teaching church and if anyone can recommend one in london, UK, i would be very appreciative.

I have also lost most of my friends in Christ as they all believe in these BIG churches and all the messages that tingle their ears. The closest i have to friends now are the people who uphold The Word of Christ in these blogs so God bless you and continue to give all who stand for sound doctrine in these days grace, mercy, peace, joy and strength.

#7  Posted by Erwin Susilo  |  Sunday, February 07, 2010at 5:27 PM

It is a global problem,

I live in Indonesia. And I hardly find pure churches here. The pastors become a motivator, the churches testimonies is about how they were blassed. The churches adopt all western book that pleased them (I only find just 1 of John's book here). Please pray for us here. Thanks.

#8  Posted by Matthew Watson  |  Monday, February 08, 2010at 10:49 AM

Thank you for these words. Sadly the mass majority of churches have become much like casinos. We put some money in and expect to win big. So-called preachers prey on the hopes and ingnorance of their congregations. Name and claim, health and wealth, they are all the same. They have rotted the church to such a point that the world and the church are now the same. It is sad that the countries where there is severe presecution, almost always have the strongest doctrine. As in the case of Russia as soon as there was some kind of freedom, the church starts to rot. While we will choose to suffer with Christ, we will not choose Christ over our economic freedoms. God help us all.

#9  Posted by Fun-chee Loh  |  Tuesday, February 09, 2010at 3:06 AM

Dear Pastor MacArthur

Thank you for speaking so honestly. While America has many good things to offer to the rest of the world, on the spiritual realm, other than you and a few other preachers, many of the rest are a negative influence. The influence of many of the health and wealth tele-evangelists are so powerful that if you look at Asia you will find thousands of churches mindlessly following the antics of these wolves in sheep's clothing. Similarly members of their churches are quite happy to surrender their minds to such unsound doctrine leading to disastrous consequences. To the many who are suffering, these preachers offer neither healing nor comfort but despair and hopelessness.

Thank you for speaking the truth and pointing Christians to the narrow gate and narrow path that leads to salvation.

#10  Posted by Darla Wormuth  |  Tuesday, February 09, 2010at 6:12 AM

Yes, Ashamed of the Gospel.